data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4035/f4035fde41703efbf50198aafacff9d1c2025dc8" alt=""
As we’ve seen, there is much deception in the world of food and marketing, but what made this decision so noteworthy was that Procter & Gamble, Pringles’ corporate parent, argued that Pringles aren’t potato chips.
Huh?
This may come as a huge surprise, but the case had to do with money. In England, potato chips—unlike most food—are subject to a 15% national tax. P&G had actually won a lower court decision last year, using the less-than-50% argument to gain a short-lived victory. The latest ruling, though, will cost P&G about $30 million per year.
Is it any wonder why P&G took the stance it did?
No comments:
Post a Comment